Choose step:
Click on phase
to select
The Civic
Energy Cycle
1. Initiation
2. Planning
3. Roll-out
4. Reflection
Show Civic Energy Cycle
previous: Selection of enablers | next: Business model development

Phase: Planning

Feasability assessment

Feasibility assessments focus not only on reviewing available technology or market trends but also on examining how and if your selected enablers can deliver the anticipated benefits. Assessing possible risks that your initiative might encounter is another crucial step to consider.

In order to get civic energy initiatives off the ground, certain capacities are needed among the stakeholders involved. Five different capacity needs were identified and ranked by the COBEN project partners according to the priority of their relevance for civic energy developments.

The COBEN project has taken a deeper look at the risks of various civic energy initiatives around Europe. The information given here has been taken from surveys we collected from our partners' pilot projects. A more theoretical approach to risks can be found in the "Risk Matrix" introduced in the Roll-out's phase Management installation.

Business Model
Answer
Rated
Enablers - Operational
lack of entrepreneurship in the cooperative board
Substantial
lack of management capacity of the cooperative board
High
Keeping the parking lot and charger
Low
to much potential cooperative members for a relatively small project
Substantial
lack of management capacity in the cooperative
Substantial
that energy clubs cannot maintain their commitment
Substantial
that the craftsmen do not prioritize dialogue with homeowners due to busyness, etc.
Substantial
not enough capable board members in the cooperative to manage and operate the solar field
Substantial
Enablers - Community
lack of volunteers in the community to create a board
Negligible
participation of the cooperative partner
High
not enough members enrolled
Substantial
Cooperative partner
Substantial
willingness of wind turbines owners to finance environemtal fund
High
Consumers are not ready to change habits
High
No local buy-in at the local/community level due to old news, fake news and lack of insights into the cost and solutions in existing home energy solutions.
Substantial
No local buy-in at the private/consumer level due to old news, fake news and lack of insights into the cost and solutions in existing home energy solutions.
High
lack of interest from homeowners for energy improvements and energy audits
Substantial
lack of DSO cooperation
High
users community buildings refuse cooperation
Low
willingness of actors to connect to heatnet
Substantial
not enough volunteers for a cooperative board
Substantial
willingness of wind turbines owners to accept citizen shareholders
Low
As a community-led initiative it depends on local capacity and capability. Capacity is a key risk, especially where development is dependent on volunteer resource. Where some level of paid resource is not available to progress the development of the plan and follow through on implementation there is a risk that timescales may not be met and implementation not followed through.
High
landowner/ developer not willing to cooperate
Substantial
Old news, fake news and lack of insights into the cost of privately owned transport solutions
High
no support in neighbouring communities
Low
no enthusiasm in the community/ no active members for the cooperative
Substantial
no citizen involvement
Substantial
Enablers - Financial
Price of back-up heat source capacity
Low
not enough coopertive members in the zip code area to bear the financing of the solar field
Substantial
not enough profits to form a community fund
Negligible
landowner/ developer selling the development with permits and subsidies
Substantial
Lack of uptake – not enough kilometers to commercially / financially viable
High
Price of the rest heat
High
Price of the rest heat
High
No local buy-in from rental agencies
Substantial
Subsidies
High
Uncertainty in heat sales and thus generated energy fees
High
Competition with natural gas prices
Substantial
not enough profits to pay back public loan
Negligible
Enablers - Regulatory
experimental regulation being revoked by the law makers
High
Legal
Substantial
legal action against the municipality by the project developer
Low
Enablers - Technology
Grid import restrictions may restrict the size of the proposed DC 50kW electric vehicle charger
Low
no grid capacity to connect the initiative
Low
no grid capacity available
High